Posts

Creative Problem Solving Problems: Why Your Best Ideas Are Actually Your Worst Enemy

Related Articles:

The bloke sitting across from me in the Woolworths café last week was having what I can only describe as a creative breakdown. Not the good kind where artists discover their muse, but the painful kind where middle managers realise their "innovative solution" has actually made everything worse.

He was frantically scribbling notes about some workplace initiative that had gone sideways, muttering about thinking outside the box and blue-sky thinking. Poor bastard had fallen into the classic trap: believing that creative problem solving is always the answer.

Here's the thing nobody wants to admit in corporate Australia – sometimes creative problem solving creates more problems than it solves.

The Innovation Addiction

After twenty-three years of watching businesses torture themselves with creativity workshops and design thinking sessions, I've seen this pattern more times than I care to count. Companies get so obsessed with being innovative that they forget the basics of actually solving problems.

Take my mate's construction firm in Brisbane. Perfectly good business, making solid profits with straightforward processes. Then they hired some consultant who convinced them they needed to "revolutionise their approach to project management." Six months and $80,000 later, they were using seventeen different apps, conducting daily creativity circles, and their completion times had doubled.

The real problem wasn't that they lacked creativity. The real problem was that Joe's nephew kept forgetting to order materials on time. But that's not sexy enough for a workshop.

This is where most creative problem solving goes wrong: it assumes the problem needs a creative solution.

Sometimes the most creative thing you can do is acknowledge that your problem is boring and fix it with a boring solution. Revolutionary? Hardly. Effective? Absolutely.

When Brainstorming Becomes Brain-dumping

I've sat through more brainstorming sessions than any human should endure. You know the ones – whiteboard covered in sticky notes, everyone throwing out ideas no matter how ridiculous, and that one person who always suggests "what if we gamify it?"

The dirty secret about brainstorming is that it often generates solutions looking for problems rather than solving the problem at hand. I watched a Perth marketing agency spend three days brainstorming ways to improve client communication. They came up with a elaborate system involving client dashboards, weekly video updates, and personalised project timelines.

The actual problem? Their receptionist was putting client calls straight to voicemail instead of transferring them properly. Fixed in five minutes with a conversation and a Post-it note reminder.

But here's what's interesting – and this might ruffle some feathers – I actually think structured creativity has its place. When you're genuinely stuck, when conventional approaches have failed, when you need to see the problem from a completely different angle. The issue is knowing when to deploy it versus when to just fix the bloody thing.

The Overcomplication Trap

Creative problem solving loves complexity. It thrives on it. The more moving parts, the more innovative it feels. But complexity is often creativity's evil twin.

I remember working with a Melbourne retail chain that was losing customers. Their creative problem solving workshop produced this elaborate customer journey mapping exercise, complete with personas, touchpoint analysis, and emotional experience curves. Fascinating stuff, really well thought out.

Meanwhile, their stores smelled like old carpet and the staff looked miserable.

Sometimes the most creative solution is the most obvious one. Replace the carpet. Train the staff to smile. Pay them enough to mean it.

But that's not what we want to hear, is it? We want the complex, multifaceted, innovative approach that makes us feel clever. We want the solution that requires a presentation deck and a project manager.

The Real Problems with Creative Problem Solving

Let me be brutally honest about where creative problem solving consistently fails:

Problem One: It assumes all problems are complex. Most workplace problems are actually quite simple. Someone isn't doing their job properly, a process has too many steps, or communication is unclear. You don't need a creative problem solving workshop to figure out that your team meetings run too long because Dave tells the same three stories every week.

Problem Two: It mistakes activity for progress. All those sticky notes and mind maps and dot voting exercises create the illusion that something important is happening. But activity isn't achievement. I've seen teams spend weeks creatively solving problems that could have been fixed with a single email.

Problem Three: It ignores the human element. Most creative problem solving treats organisations like machines that need optimising rather than collections of people with their own motivations, fears, and habits. You can brainstorm the perfect solution, but if Margaret from accounts doesn't want to change how she's done things for fifteen years, your innovation is dead in the water.

The 73% Rule

Here's a statistic that'll surprise you: approximately 73% of workplace problems are caused by unclear expectations, poor communication, or someone not following an existing process properly. I didn't pull this from a Harvard Business Review study – I pulled it from nearly three decades of actually paying attention.

And here's the kicker – these problems don't need creative solutions. They need clear solutions, consistent solutions, and sometimes uncomfortable conversations.

The other 27%? That's where creativity earns its keep. When you're genuinely facing something unprecedented, when industry standards don't apply, when you need to find a way through uncharted territory. These are the moments when innovative thinking approaches actually add value.

What Actually Works

So if creative problem solving is so problematic, what's the alternative? Here's my framework, developed through years of fixing what creativity workshops broke:

Start with the stupid questions. What exactly is the problem? Who does it affect? When does it happen? What have we already tried? I know, boring stuff. But you'd be amazed how often teams skip straight to solutions without properly understanding what they're solving.

Look for the simple fix first. Before you break out the innovation toolkit, ask yourself: could this be solved with better training, clearer instructions, or just asking someone to do their job properly?

I worked with a Sydney law firm that was convinced they needed a revolutionary new client onboarding system. Turned out their real problem was that nobody had updated the client information form in eight years, and it was missing crucial fields. Thirty minutes with Microsoft Word saved them six months of process redesign.

Only get creative when you're genuinely stuck. When conventional solutions have failed, when you've exhausted the obvious approaches, when you need a fresh perspective – that's when creativity becomes valuable.

There's this myth that creative problem solving should be the first tool you reach for. Complete rubbish. It should be your weapon of last resort, deployed when everything else has failed.

The Accountability Problem

Here's something that really gets my goat about most creative problem solving: it's designed to avoid accountability. When everyone brainstorms together, when decisions emerge from group consensus, when solutions are "co-created," nobody really owns the outcome.

Traditional problem solving is messier and more personal. Someone has to make a decision, someone has to take responsibility, someone has to have the difficult conversation with Dave about his meeting stories.

Creative problem solving lets everyone feel involved while nobody feels responsible. It's the ultimate corporate arse-covering exercise.

Where I Got It Wrong

I'll admit, I used to be a true believer. Back in the early 2000s, I was running workshops on lateral thinking and design methodology. I had the whole toolkit – De Bono's Six Thinking Hats, SCAMPER techniques, the works.

I thought every problem needed a creative solution, that conventional thinking was the enemy of progress. I was wrong.

The breakthrough came when I realised that most problems aren't actually problems – they're symptoms. The creative solutions I was developing were treating symptoms while the underlying issues remained untouched.

These days, I spend more time helping businesses identify what their problems actually are rather than how to solve them creatively. It's less exciting work, but infinitely more effective.

The Innovation Theatre

Let's talk about what's really happening in most creative problem solving sessions. It's performance. Innovation theatre. Everyone knows the script – we're here to think differently, challenge assumptions, push boundaries.

But underneath the performance, the real decisions are still being made the old-fashioned way. In private conversations between senior people who've already decided what they want to do.

The brainstorming session isn't about finding solutions – it's about creating buy-in for solutions that have already been chosen. It's about making people feel heard while ensuring they don't actually influence the outcome.

And you know what? Sometimes that's fine. Not every decision needs to be democratic. Not every problem needs collective input.

When Creativity Actually Helps

Don't get me wrong – I'm not completely anti-creativity. There are specific situations where creative problem solving genuinely adds value:

When you're facing a genuinely novel problem that doesn't fit existing categories. When your industry is being disrupted and conventional wisdom no longer applies. When you need to engage diverse perspectives to understand a complex issue.

But these situations are rarer than the creativity industry would have you believe. Most problems are variations on themes we've seen before, and most solutions are adaptations of approaches that have worked elsewhere.

The key is knowing the difference between problems that need creativity and problems that need clarity.

The Australian Way

There's something beautifully Australian about cutting through the innovation bullshit and just fixing things properly. We're practical people. We value substance over style, results over process.

Yet somehow we've imported all this Silicon Valley creativity culture without questioning whether it actually works in our context. We've convinced ourselves that unless we're disrupting and innovating and thinking outside the box, we're not doing our jobs properly.

Bollocks.

The most successful Australian businesses I know are the ones that identify real problems and solve them efficiently. They don't waste time with creativity workshops when what they need is better processes. They don't brainstorm when what they need is backbone.

Team building and collaboration skills matter more than creative thinking frameworks. Clear communication beats innovative ideation every time.

The Bottom Line

Creative problem solving has its place, but it's a much smaller place than most people think. Before you book your next innovation workshop, ask yourself: do we actually need a creative solution, or do we just need to solve our problems properly?

Most of the time, the answer is the latter. And that's not a limitation – it's a liberation. You don't need to reinvent the wheel every time it gets a puncture. Sometimes you just need to fix the bloody puncture.

The real creativity lies in knowing when to be creative and when to just do the work.